Government of India Act 1919
The Government of India Act 1919, also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (or Mont-Ford Reforms), was passed to fulfill the British promise of "gradual development of self-governing institutions" in India.
It is named after Edwin Montagu (Secretary of State) and Lord Chelmsford (Viceroy).
### 1. Key Features: The Birth of "Diarchy"
This Act introduced structural changes that were much more significant than the 1909 reforms:
Diarchy in Provinces: This is the most important feature. The provincial subjects were divided into two parts:
Transferred Subjects: Administered by the Governor with the help of ministers responsible to the Legislative Council (e.g., Education, Health, Agriculture).
Reserved Subjects: Administered by the Governor and his executive council without being responsible to the Legislative Council (e.g., Law and Order, Finance, Land Revenue).
Bicameralism at the Centre: For the first time, a bicameral legislature (two houses) was introduced at the central level:
Council of State (Upper House)
Central Legislative Assembly (Lower House)
Direct Elections: The Act introduced direct elections in the country for the first time, though the right to vote (franchise) was limited by property, tax, or education.
Extension of Communal Representation: The principle of separate electorates (started in 1909 for Muslims) was extended to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, and Europeans.
New Offices: * Established a Public Service Commission (led to the setting up of the Central Public Service Commission in 1926).
Created the office of the High Commissioner for India in London.
Separation of Budgets: For the first time, Provincial budgets were separated from the Central budget.
### 2. Significance for UPSC & APSC
Responsible Government: It was the first time the British government used the term "Responsible Government" in a legal document.
Provincial Autonomy: By demarcating and separating central and provincial subjects, it laid the early tracks for federalism.
Statutory Commission: The Act provided for the appointment of a statutory commission after 10 years to study its working (this led to the Simon Commission in 1927).
### 3. Critical Analysis (The "Catch")
Diarchy was a Failure: The division of subjects was illogical. For example, a Minister had "Agriculture" (Transferred), but the "Irrigation" and "Finance" needed for it were "Reserved" under the Governor.
Limited Franchise: Only about 3% of the population had the right to vote.
Veto Power: The Governor-General retained massive powers to override the central legislature.
### 4. Quick Revision Table
| Feature | Details |
| Provincial System | Diarchy (Reserved and Transferred subjects) |
| Central Legislature | Bicameral (Upper and Lower Houses) |
| Separate Electorates | Extended to Sikhs, Christians, Anglo-Indians |
| First PSC | Provision for a Public Service Commission |
| Elections | Introduction of Direct Elections |
Comparison: 1909 vs. 1919
| Feature | 1909 (Morley-Minto) | 1919 (Mont-Ford) |
| Focus | Increase participation | "Responsible Government" |
| Elections | Indirect | Direct (Limited) |
| Legislature | Unicameral | Bicameral at Centre |
| Communalism | Only Muslims | Sikhs, Christians, etc. added |
Comments
Post a Comment